Curriculum Should Be Created by Educators

The Leader in Me was not created by educators.  Stephen Covey has a B.S in business administration, an MBA from Harvard, and a Doctor of Religious Education from Brigham Young University.  Sean Covey has a degree in English, and an MBA from Harvard.  FranklinCovey is a corporation that serves other corporations.

Here’s a list of their open positions at FranklinCovey.  There are no teachers or educators on that list.

On The Leader in Me website, there is no list of a team of teachers, principals, educators, psychologists, or behavioral specialists who worked on creating the LIM curriculum. There’s very little information at all about how the material was created, and none at all about how it was vetted.

As a result, the materials schools get when they purchase this expensive ($50,000+) curriculum is sub-par.  As an example, here is a snippet from the Teacher’s Guide for Kindergarten for the 6th Habit:

Habit 6: Synergize®

In this section, students will:

  1. Express and present information and ideas clearly in oral, visual, and written forms.
  2. Use their own unique talents and abilities to the fullest; value others’ talents and abilities.
  3. Cultivate the ability to inspire, motivate, and draw out the best in others.
  4. Communicate and work as a team in a multicultural and interdependent world.
  5. Show initiative and entrepreneurialism.

It’s hard to imagine that anyone with daily experience with 5-year-olds would expect them to “present information and ideas clearly in oral, visual, and written forms”.  I volunteer in a kindergarten classroom weekly. When they raise their hand, it takes them 3-4 tries to get out a sentence, and even then it may or may not make sens.  The majority of them have trouble writing all their letters, much less a sentence.  They definitely aren’t in a place where they can communicate information and ideas in written form.  And nothing about the LIM program is going to magically make them be suddenly able to do these things. They need to practice with a pencil and paper, not practice synergizing.  As for showing entrepreneurialism – they’re 5.  They can’t tell a nickel from a quarter, and are likely to accept 3 pennies in place of 1 dime because they’ve finally, this year, figured out that 3 is bigger than 1. Entrepreneurs?

Also in this same guide is a suggested music activity for teaching kids about Habit #1: Be Proactive.

Sing the song Itsy Bitsy Spider using the hand motions. Say, “The itsy bitsy spider was a leader; she took initiative to get to the top of the water spout. The itsy bitsy spider chose not to blame the rain; she stayed with her task.” Ask, “What did you learn about being proactive from the itsy bitsy spider? What did you learn from Sammy  Squirrel?” Use a Fishbone Diagram to chart the ideas.

This example isn’t even about being proactive.  It’s about perseverance. This material is poor, and makes you wonder who would create this for a teacher to use?

The kids at our school DID get confused by these strange examples. A first grader at our school came home one day saying that dogs are better animals than cats, because cats sleep all day, which isn’t being proactive.  Another child said that she’s not as much of a leader as her friend, because her friend likes to color, and do math, and chase the boys around the playground. That means she’s good at Sharpening the Saw (Habit #8).  But the girl telling the story said she doesn’t like chasing boys around the playground, so she’s not as good a leader.



2 thoughts on “Curriculum Should Be Created by Educators

  1. I think this article hits the heart of the problem with the The Leader in Me curriculum — apart from the religious overtones. The concepts and assignments are too advanced and misguided children to comprehend for their age. It seems that the teachers have been removed from applying their educational training and are not guiding the children. As a result the children are thinking in irrationally judgmental ways.

    • It’s interesting that you use the word “judgmental”. As this program was rolled out at our school, the themes good and bad, right and wrong, leader and non-leader, popped up everywhere. Even the concept of “Lighthouse School” is a ranking system that some schools are better at Leadership than others. I’m reminded that when the teachers were teaching the kids about the Habit “Be Proactive”, every teacher put up a big poster in the front of the room and wrote the name of a kid on there when they saw that child do something proactive. So of course the kids talked about who was proactive, and who wasn’t. Something about this program’s black and white language and attitude seems to cause this judgmental behavior to come out in spades.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s